Course

Home

Syllabus

Lecture Topics

Homework

Policies


Math 2001-004: Intro to Discrete Math, Fall 2026


Lecture Topics


Date
What we discussed/How we spent our time
Aug 21
Syllabus. Policies. Text. The use of AI in this class.
Aug 24
I define the main goals of the course to be:

(1) To learn what it means to say ``Mathematics is constructed to be well founded.'' To learn which concepts and assertions depend on which others. To learn what are the most primitive concepts ( = set, $\in$) and the most primitive assertions ( = axioms of set theory).

(2) To learn how to unravel the definitions of ``function'', ``number'', and ``infinite'', through layers of more and more primitive concepts, back to ``set'' and ``$\in$''.

(3) To learn the meanings of, and the distinction between, ``truth'' and ``provability''. To learn proof strategies.

(4) To learn formulas for counting.

Axioms of set theory.

I will occasionally post notes for Math 2001 in the form of flash cards on Quizlet. To join our quizlet class, go to https://quizlet.com/join/mExWGGZqj.

(Test yourself on the Axioms of Set Theory with this Quizlet link: https://quizlet.com/_61ko6h.)

Aug 26
Read Sections 1.1 and 2.1.

We began discussing `naive' set theory, in which we `define' a set to be an unordered collection of distinct objects. We contrasted this with formal set theory based on the axiom system ZFC (Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Choice). We discussed
(i) the symbol $\in$.
(ii) the Axiom of Extensionality.
(iii) the Axiom of the Empty Set.
(iv) the Axiom of Pairing.
(iv) the Axiom of Union and the definition of the successor function: $S(x)=x\cup \{x\}$.
(v) the definitions of $0, 1, 2, 3, 4$.
(vi) the recursive definition of addition of natural numbers.
Using these definitions, we proved that $2+2=4$.

Aug 28
We discussed expanding the language of set theory following these slides. This included a discussion of the subset relation and the power set function.
Aug 31
We discussed
(i) the directed graph model of set theory.
(ii) the Axiom of Separation.
(iii) the fact that Naive Set Theory is inconsistent (Russell's Paradox).

Quiz 1 solutions.

Sep 2
We reviewed Unrestricted Comprehension versus Restricted Comprehension, Russell's paradox, and the fact that naive set theory is inconsistent. Then we discussed
(i) why there is no set of all sets.
(ii) why we do not need an Axiom of Intersection.
(iii) the Axioms of Replacement, Choice, and Foundation.
(iv) how the Axiom of Replacement can be used in place of the Axiom of Separation to separate out nonempty subsets of a given set.
(v) the fact that the Axiom of Choice is equivalent over ZF to the statement that every set can be enumerated y an ordinal.
(vi) the fact that the Axiom of Foundation implies that the successor function is injective.
Sep 4
We discussed Ordered Pairs and Relations.