EdFromO's Open Questions

These are some non-mathematical open questions I have been thinking about. Their purpose is not necessarily to entertain - I really would like to know.

More questions as I think of them, and fewer as they get answered.

Last modified: Sun Aug 3 10:01:20 BST 2003

Unanswered Questions


Answered Questions

Question:
Does Father Ted look like Radovan Karadzic?
Answer:
Yes.
Comments:
I am grateful to Paul ``Ishamael'' Cherry for sorting this matter out. Father Ted is the eponymous character in a rather good British (pretending to be Irish) sitcom.
Question:
What is Billie short for in the context of American women?
Answer:
Wilhelmina, according to Greta ``Goldy'' Braunstein.
Question:
Does the German Teppich come from the French tapis, vice versa, or neither?
Answer:
German Teppich comes from the French tapis - it was probably borrowed about the sixteenth/seventeenth centuries when France was at the head of the furnishings and luxuries world. Apparently.
Comments:
I am grateful to Hugh ``Medea'' Robinson for this information.
Question:
Why do the drinks machines in the maths institute never give 5p coins in change?
Answer:
Elizabeth ``Morgause'' Wootten writes: They never give you any 5 pences in change, but that's because they always give me nothing else. I'm getting your share... do you have my share of 20 pences ?
Comment:
Charles Walkden, an ergodic theorist, adds: (Presumably this was at Oxford?) [Yes - Ed.] Was it a Klix machine? We have one at Manchester (specifically, a Klix 400), and it only ever gives 5s and 20s in change, even if one pumps it full of 10s and 50s for a few days beforehand. Conspiracy theories on a postcard to...
Question:
Why do people talk about ``meteoric rises'', e.g. to fame? Are meteors known for rising very quickly? Have I missed something? You never hear about ``meteoric falls'', do you?
Answer:
Wendy ``Elisheva'' Bat-Sarah writes: I think the point is (or rather was, back when people knew why they said anything), that those who rise quickly to world reknown tend to crash to earth rather abruptly as well.
Robin ``Saomik'' Dawes disagrees: Hesitant as I am to disagree with Elisheva, I think the allusion is simply to the speed, brightness, and apparent spontaneity of a meteor's passage.
Colin Batchelor ``Bedroom'' asked:
Does heavy petting involve alsatians and St Bernards?
Answer:
No.
Question:
The r to z functor. Truncate a name at the letter `r' and turn the `r' to a `z'. Behold - you have a nickname. Is the average person who uses this aware of the rule? Is this rule really natural? Where did it come from?
Answer:
Colin Batchelor ``Bedroom'' writes: This is a general feature of languages, the changing of r to z, and I shall furnish you with a few examples:
  • The French chaise comes from the Latin word ``cathedra''. We borrowed it when it was at the ``chair'' stage.
  • Our word ``freeze/froze/frozen'' was originally ``frire/frore/gefroren'', as I think you'll find it's still similar in German.
  • You know the old woman in ``David Copperfield'' who says ``I'm a lost lorn creetur'', well ``lose'' is cognate with the German ``verlieren'' of which the p.p. is ``verloren'' and like the still extant English ``lovelorn''.
You can be forlorn and lovelorn but I don't know of any others. Rs often change to Zs, basically, and folk do this all the time without realising it.
However, linguists disagree with the above:
D. Edward Gund v. Brighoff off sci.lang writes: Unfortunately, he's got it perfectly backwards. With one exception (where the change took place before the word was English), these are all examples of the opposite, the shifting of /z/ -> /r/.
  • French has both chaire and chaise. We borrowed first the one, then the other.
  • I can't find any support for the statement that our word ``freeze/froze/frozen'' was originally ``frire/frore/gefroren''. The OED gives the earliest attested forms as freosan/freas/froren deriving from Common Germanic *freus-, *fraus, *frozono-. The shift of *r -> *z before a stressed vowel is regular in West Germanic. English formed a new past participle by analogy with the present and past forms, while German went the other route and formed new present and past conjugations on the basis of the past participle.
  • The same story applies to the old woman in ``David Copperfield'', except in this case we created a new weak past participle rather than a strong one. Middle High German has verliesen, which later became verlieren on the basis of verloren.
Question:
The 555 conspiracy: in films/TV, American phone numbers always end in 555 plus four other numbers, to stop idiots ringing the numbers. Is this really necessary?
Answer:
Colin Batchelor ``Bedroom'' writes: I do know that idiots used to try phoning one of the phone numbers listed in the Hitchhikers' Guide to the Galaxy, and the folk who lived at the far end of it were pretty irritated, but then various Phonedays came along and changed all that, so yes, 555 is really necessary.
Another answer:
Nick Sweeney writes: After a thread at haddock we were reminded that Steve Wozniak got himself a 888-8888 number, only for him to be plagued with heavy-breathing baby callers who were pressing the button repeatedly.
Owen Massey adds:
Oftel has set aside certain ranges of numbers which can safely appear in TV shows. What's pleasing is that they've taken the trouble to satisfy those of us with a good working knowledge of telephone number prefixes by allotting 10 numbers for each of the principal cities in Great Britain and even for special services like mobiles/pagers.
See http://www.oftel.gov.uk/numbers/drama599.htm
Question:
Lambros Lambrou, a pianist, writes: Further to your question, ``What are my statutory rights...'', I have a question of my own that I'd like to know the answer to. Why is it, that on promotional packs of various foods, they always have a non-purchase option. You know, something like ``No purchase required, just send... (blah) ...and a promotional pack will be opened on your behalf...'' Why do they bother? What's the point?
Answer
``R.J.'' Marsh writes: Further to the question posed by Lambros Lambrou, a pianist, on your webpage, I would like to offer an answer. The idea of offering to open packets on your behalf is to ensure that the draw really is free. So, if you don't want to purchase the product you are still entitled to enter into the draw. Otherwise the whole thing would be deemed a lottery and thus subject to somewhat stricter laws. This answer was brought to you by a quantum group, the number p and the letter q.
Question:
Why is the Latin for ``promise'' pollicio? Does it have anything to do with a ritual involving thumbs?
Answer:
Hugh ``Medea'' Robinson writes: pollicior is corrupt for pro-licior from liceor, I buy/sell.
Question:
What are my statutory rights? Yes, I know they're not affected!
Answer:
Rhiannon Macfie writes: Your statutory rights are many and varied, but the ones that shops insist are not affected by their guarantees are the rights that you have under the Sale of Goods Act 1976. This states that if something you buy malfunctions or is shown to be faulty within seven days of purchase, then you are entitled to a refund or a replacement (your choice, not that of the shop).
Owen Massey adds: In Burton (the clothes shop, not the home of Bass brewers) I saw a notice behind the counter reading We are pleased to offer this in addition to your statutory rights, where ``this'' detailed their returns policy.
Question:
Why are ``love interests'' always female? Or are they?
Answer:
Rhiannon Macfie writes: Historically, the ``love interest'' referred to the romantic subplot of a primarily non-romantic story - eg a detective story or a thriller. This subplot, especially in the case of serials, was supposed to make the story attractive to a wider audience and sustain interest in the flagging middle portion of the plot. Lazy writing has tended to label the (usually female, because most heroes (still, unfortunately) are male) cause of the love interest as the ``love interest'' per se.
Lambros Lambrou, a pianist asked:
I have another question to put to all the legal boffins out there. When you purchase a product and it gives you a coupon which entitles you to a discount (or whatever), it often states something like "cash value: 0.000000001p". What are the legal goings-on here? Surely, the bit of paper itself would technically have a cash-value greater than this? Does it mean that you could give this bit of paper back to the company and demand this sum of money from them? How would they pay you?
Answer:
Rhiannon Macfie writes: The ``cash value'' of a coupon is printed on it and given a low value in order to stop people brandishing them at the issuer and saying ``Yes, I know this coupon gives me 5 off a set of matching teacosies, but that must mean that the token is worth 5, so can I just have my five pounds please?''. The exceedingly low value is designed to put people off collecting several off them and getting cash instead of the thing that they want you to buy. Theoretically, you could save up 100 of these and claim a penny, but ask yourself: Is chweing your way through all that breakfast cereal really worth it?
Why do many pint glasses bear the numbers ``303'' or ``562'' [next to the crown]?
Colin Batchelor ``Bedroom'' has been researching this question. (Continued page 94.)
According to the Guardian's ``Notes and Queries'' column, the number is a function of the inspector who checked the glass.
Charles Walkden, an ergodic theorist, asked:
One often finds the last page of some technical documentation (for electrical appliances, software, etc) left blank. This page often has the phrase `Page deliberately left blank' or `Page intentionally left blank' written on it. Why? Has anyone ever tried to sue a manufacturer for not making it clear at which point the instructions stop? The most recent - and bizarre - example of this was in a preprint I was glancing through. A (numbered) blank page (which had been deliberately left blank) had been inserted between the end of the preprint and the references. It wasn't as if the preprint had been designed for two-sided printing either...
Answer:
Matthew Garrett writes: Open questions. Does this imply the existence of closed questions? Probably not. But still. The reason for pages containing nothing but the words "This is a blank page" (or derivatives thereof) is obvious, AS ANY FULE KNO. It is to ensure that it is exceedingly obvious to all concerned that the copy of the documentation does not contain missing diagrams - after all, although the chances of a diagram being missing are slim, the chances of the diagram being missing and the text "This is a blank page" being in its place are so small as to be considered negligable. The inherent contradiction in printing "Blank Page" on a blank page cuased me much amusement throughout my GCSEs and A-Levels. As you may have guessed, I am very easily amused.
Does ``trying multi'' (in the context of http) ever actually work?
Answer:
George Foot posted the following to ox.test. This has bothered me for some time, and I think I now know the answer. It does work, pretty often. CERN HTTPD servers, at least versions 3.0 and 3.0a, are the ones that produce the error message, unless they're differently configured. If you're interested, you can download the source from somewhere on http://www.w3.org/ and grep it for "even tried multi" and "HTAA_MULTI_FAILED".
Is there only one Monopolies and Mergers Commission?
Answer
``Yes'', according to Elizabeth ``Morgause'' Wootten.
Why? If there used to be more, did they merge?
Nick Sweeney points out: Just looked at your open questions, and [this] one needs revision. As you're probably now well aware, there is no longer a single Monopolies and Mergers Commission: under the newlabour policy of ``renaming everything'', it's now known by the moniker of ``The Competition Commission''. Is this an attempt by the nanny-state to put a stop to the "why is there only one?" gag, or an attempt to bust the cartel of crossword compilers and quizmasters?
Why do all those countries' names end in -stan?
Answer:
Colin Batchelor ``Bedroom'' writes: -stan is Urdu and in a few other languages for -land. Further, ``stan'' means ``land''. Good, eh?
Anna Kirsten Nygaard asked:
Are tadpoles animals? Are frogs' eggs animals? When do they become animals if they're not at the egg and tadpole stage? What is the scientific answer to this, as opposed to an ethical answer?
Answer:
Edvard ``Eddie `The Eagle''' Nygaard (relation) says: I think frogs' and toads' eggs become tadpoles when the egg bursts (even if they look like little tadpoles even before this), and that they become frogs/toads when the tail drops off (even if the legs grow out a bit before that). Have no scientific proof for this.

  • Back to main page